The facts are these: First, Jewry is absolutely a race and not a religious association.
Their discussion of circumcision pp begins with a claim that because only 16 actually 9 according to their own table of the men aged were intact compared to 26 of the 81 older menthere was "a medical trend toward urging routine circumcision of the newborn male infant.
They also assume their sample of volunteers who were comfortable having sex in front of the experimenters was representative of the whole population of the US, and the 35 intact ones representative of all intact men.
They continue in prose famous for its obscurity and ugliness: The phallic fallacy that the uncircumcised male can establish ejaculatory control more effectively than his circumcised counterpart was accepted almost universally as biologic fact by both circumcised and uncircumcised male study subjects.
Magazines like Penthouse were suggesting that intact men with premature ejaculation might get circumcised to prevent it.
All involved in this fallacy seem to have been unaware that the foreskin can retract. Masters and Johnson ignore the possiblity that the foreskin itself is involved in sexual sensation. A limited number of the male study-subject population was exposed to a brief clinical experiment designed to disprove [Real scientists aim to test, not prove or disprove] the false premise [If it had not yet been disproved, how did they know it was false?
The 35 uncircumcised males were matched at random with circumcised study subjects of similar ages. Routine neurologic testing for both exteroceptive and light tactile discrimination were conducted on the ventral and dorsal surfaces of the penile body, with particular attention directed toward the glans.
It is unclear what "particular attention" means. It goes without saying that no attention was given to the foreskin, nor could it be with the circumcised "male study subjects". It had nothing to do with sex. They were apparently previously unaware that foreskins usually retract.
This is linked to a later p discussion of "automanipulation" masturbation: Uncircumcised males have not been observed to concentrate specifically on the glans area of the penis. They were playing with their much more sensitive foreskins but Masters and Johnson failed to notice that.
Stroking techniques rarely move sufficiently distal on the shaft of the penis to encounter more than the coronal ridge of the glans even late in plateau phase just before ejaculation. This is obviously a different picture from that occasioned by active intercourse. With full vaginal containment the foreskin not tightly attached to subjacent tissue usually retracts freely from a major portion of the glans during active male coital thrusting before ejaculation.
On this was based the whole of the case that "circumcision has no effect on sexual function" until further studies with flaws of their own see below were used to make the same claim. Extensive neurological testing of such sensations as touch and pain sensitivity failed to reveal any differences in those with and without foreskins.
He died a few weeks later. Collaborator Robert Kolodny said that he never once heard Masters or Johnson refer to this study, but thought Masters might have done it in collaboration with his physiologist at the time, Dr.
Slater died years ago. Kolodny says most of the research notes from that period have been discarded, because of the rising costs of storage.
American psychologist William James wrote: The emotions aren’t always immediately subject to reason, but they are always immediately subject to action. Emotions — whether fear or love, pity or anger — are powerful motivators for your audience. An audience emotionally stimulated in the right. Welcome to the American Perspectives Volume I eText Website for Houston Community College. Follow the instructions below to redeem the access code found in the Pearson Learning Solutions Student Access Kit that was packaged with your book. The case against infant circumcision and for genital integrity.
He guessed that "light tactile discrimination" meant single-point threshold sensitivity, although he had no idea what "exteroceptive discrimination" meant. Ms Kimmel could not reach Virginia Johnson in St. Louis, but everyone she spoke to thought Johnson was most probably not involved in the study at all.
In sharp contrast is the importance Masters and Johnson attach to the role of the clitoral hood female prepuce in intercourse: A mechanical traction develops on both sides of the clitoral hood of the minor labia subsequent to penile distention of the vaginal outlet.
With active penile thrusting, the clitoral body is pulled downward toward the pudendum [Masters and Johnson define the "pudendum" as "the mons pubis, labia majora, labia minora, and the vestibule of the vagina".
When the penile shaft is in the withdrawal phase of active coital stroking, traction on the clitoral hood is somewhat relieved and the body and glans return to normal pudendal-overhang positioning If the vaginal outlet is too expanded to allow strong traction on the minor-labial hood by the thrusting penis, minimal clitoral excursion will occur and little if any secondary stimulation will develop.
In response to an enquiry about the role of the clitoral hood, "Charlou" at RichardDawkins.
Direct stimulation of my clitoris concentrates the sensation too intensely for me, particularly close to and during clitoral orgasm. Manipulation over and around the hood and labia is both exquisitely pleasurable and extends the orgasm. Often controlling and delaying the clitoral orgasm this way generates a deeper internal orgasm.
A more recent study makes the same mistake, perhaps more glaringly.A comprehensive, coeducational Catholic High school Diocese of Wollongong - Albion Park Act Justly, love tenderly and walk humbly with your God Micah The case against infant circumcision and for genital integrity.
Mission Statement. NOVA is committed to ensuring all students have an opportunity to pursue a college education regardless of the presence or absence of a disability. AS WE EXPLORE a sampling of Hitler’s early views on the Jews, we shall discover striking parallels to conditions existing in our own day.
Jewish propagandists would have us believe that Hitler’s unfavorable attitude toward Jewry was based solely on a “racial” hostility between Aryans and the.
Feb 07, · How to Write a Critique in Five Paragraphs. A critique is usually written in response to a creative work, such as a novel, a film, poetry, or a painting.
However, critiques are also sometimes assigned for research articles and media items. Definition: what is pathos? Why is it critical for public speakers? Examines pathos and emotional connection with a speaker's audience.